Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ù»äÉ ð¯ìéêáÏ¿öÍ ðÄÑ¢ßÃã÷ÀÌ ù»äÉ ð¯ìéá³Ï¿öÍ Øðõó¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ç¯úÂ

THE INFLUENCE ON THE ERUPTION OF MANDIBULAR 1st PREMOLARS AFTER PREMATURE LOSS OF MANDIBULAR 1st DECIDUOUS MOLARS

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1984³â 11±Ç 1È£ p.91 ~ 101
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Â÷¹®È£(ó³Ùþûß)/Bong-Ik Cha Â÷ºÀÀÍ(ó³ÜóìÏ)/Moon-Ho Cha

Abstract

Ì¿ÒÕ
ù»äÉ êáÏ¿öÍÀÇ Ü»áµ(lesion)¿Í ðÄÑ¢ßÃã÷(premature loss)ÀÌ Í©ã¯öÍ Øðõó¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ç¯úÂÀ»
æÚϼÇϱâ êÓÇÏ¿© 3ᨿ¡¼­ 9ᨱîÁöÀÇ ¾î¸°ÀÌ 580Ù£ÀÇ orthopantomogram ñé¿¡¼­ ù»äÉ ð¯ìé
êáÏ¿öÍ ñ§éÓö°ÀÌ ïáßÈÀÎ ä®ÔÛ 290Ù£À» ïáßÈÏØ, ø¸ö° ܻᵸ¦ °®°í ÀÖ´Â ä®ÔÛ 113Ù£À» ÝïÎò¥°
ÏØ, 8á¨ì¤îñ¿¡ ø¸ö° ÚûöÍÇÑ ä®ÔÛ 55Ù£À» ÝïÎò ¥±ÏØÀ¸·ÎÇÏ¿© ñ§éÓö° Í©ã¯öÍ»çÀÌÀÇ Øðõóó¬×ä
¿Í ßÓÓßîÜ êÈöǸ¦ κóÌÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº Ì¿ÒÕÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ÝïÎòÏØ¿¡¼­ ù»äÉ ð¯ìéêáÏ¿öÍ ñ§éÓö°ÀÇ Øðõóó¬×ä´Â ïáßÈÏغ¸´Ù ´õ Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
2. ܻᵰ¡ ÀÖ´Â Ý»êÈ Í©ã¯öÍ´Â ïáßÈÝ»êÈ Í©ã¯öͺ¸´Ù ØðõóÀÌ õµòäµÈ ÌÑéç°¡ 40.9%, òÀæŵÈ
ÌÑéç°¡ 22.7%¿´´Ù.
3. ðÄÑ¢ßÃã÷ Ý»êÈ Í©ã¯öÍ´Â ïáßÈÝ»ëè Í©ã¯öͺ¸´Ù ØðõóÀÌ õµòäµÈ ÌÑéç°¡ 61.7%, òÀæÅµÈ ÌÑ
éç°¡ 4.3%¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study is to determine what influence the lesion and the premature
loss of mandibular 1st deciduous molar have on the eruption of its successor, and the
author deviled 580 cases of orthopantomograms from age 3 to 9 years old children into
3 groups:
Control Group: both side normal
Study I Group: one normal and the other lesion.
Study ¥± Group: one normal and the other premature loss before 8 years old.
and observed the amount of differences and the relative position in eruption between
study-tooth successor and normal-tooth successor.
The following results were obtained:
1. The differences in eruption between right and left mandibular 1st primary molars of
Study Group were greater than those of Control Group.
2. The successors of lessoned -teeth showed more accelerated eruption than the
antimeres in 40.9% and more delayed, in 22.7%.
3. The successors of premature lost-teeth showed more accelerated eruption than the
antimeres in 61.7% and more delayed, in 4.3%.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI